Peter David is a prolific author of novels, comic books and television spanning over two decades of creative input towards Pop Culture. His influence on comics is well documented and known, having written what many consider the definitive takes on The Incredible Hulk and Aquaman. His writings for Star Trek have produced New York Times Bestselling novels, and his writings in fantasy and sci-fi continue to sell.
Recently, Mr. David was the subject of internet harassment for what was believed to be his role in the Scans_Daily site takedown. While that issue has been documented by many other sites (and his role in the brouhaha has been cleared as minor at most), we wanted to give him a forum to address the issue, as well as discuss other aspects of his career. Mr. David agreed to our interview request, and for that we are grateful.
Our first topic, naturally, was around the Scans-Daily shutdown as well as the response to it. (EDITOR’S NOTE- Anything in bold or underlined is done by us for emphasis, and not by Mr. David.)
Q: Part of the underlying issue surrounding Scans Daily’s withdrawal is the continual debate on the Internet between “Free Information” movements versus the traditional intellectual property paradigm. Did you expect to be part of that argument when it came to this issue, and have you had to deal with this type of conflict before?
A: I honestly wasn’t expecting it, no, any more than the removal of movie trailers from various show biz sites prompted any sort of debate. I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen “Trailer No Longer Available; Removed by License Holder.” You don’t see the net erupt with people howling, ‘The internet should be a shiny happy place where all content is available to whomever wants it whenever they want it! Let’s string up the guy who made that trailer get taken down!” The argument had less to do with the removal of the material than it did with the shutting down of Scans. And that was entirely the decision of Live Journal. Interestingly, the fury of fandom was aimed not at Live Journal, who actually did the deed, but me, who did not.
Q: You’ve mentioned being around on the Net for over 20 years in the comments threads on your site. During that time we’ve seen the rise and fall of Napster, the continuous debate over YouTube posting tv and movie clips, and the increasing use of BitTorrent. We’ve also seen the rise of iTunes, Hulu and other legal paths for the sharing of IP. As a creator of intellectual property, do you see there ever being a true balance of power regarding the needs of the consumer versus the needs of the provider?
A:Sure. Look, if there’s money to be made, the licensors and copyright holders will find a way to make money off it. Consumers will cry and moan that they should continue to be entitled to get something for nothing, but eventually they’ll have to come to terms with the idea that you get what you pay for.
The next topic was more specific to some of the responses we found in researching the incident, including some of he more unsavory elements.
Q: Another aspect of this recent Scans Daily issue has been demonstrated in the sort of “drive-by” commenters who came to the site, spewed vitriol and then left. It has varied from the fairly benign (“I’ve never bought your books before and I certainly won’t now”) to the rather disgusting (“You and your family can all die in a fire”). Is there any room left on the internet for real debate, or are we all victim to the “instant gratification” method of replying to an issue?
A: There’s always going to be both. It seems that the drive bys constitute the minority. I’m certainly hoping so. What amazes me is the incessant repetition of a sequence of events that didn’t happen: That I showed up on Scans, people were abusive, and I in a fit of pique, unable to withstand criticism, contacted Marvel to try and have the site shut down. Except, no: I saw the pages, contacted Marvel and said, “I thought I should bring this to your attention,” and only after that did I show up on Scans.
As for the abuse: As if in decades of being on the web, no one has ever been mean to me. Hell, the very first time I ever showed up on the net, back when it was Usenet, there were people saying all kinds of nice things about my work on Spec Spidey. And I showed up and said, “Thanks for saying all those nice things.” And the response was, “Go away. Get out of here. If we know you’re reading these comments, it will have a chilling effect and we can never say anything nasty. You have no business being here. This place isn’t for you.” So what happens on Scans? A poster informed me that Scans wasn’t intended for me. A strange attitude for a public forum, but hardly new. The only thing that caught me off guard was this whole “Die in a fire thing.” When I called them on it, I was blithely informed that this is simple net speak, to be taken no more seriously than any other such “curses.” To which I would reply: Have you ever known anyone who ate shit and died? Fucked themselves? Gone to hell? I’m thinking not. That’s hyperbole. I knew someone who died in a fire. That happens. That’s real. And that’s repulsive.
In the next section, we delved more into Mr. David’s writing career overall. The first topic was regarding the recent decision by Marvel Comics to close the open submissions policy.
Q: Your early career was boosted by an open submission to Marvel Comics of a story called “The Death of Jean DeWolff.” Recently, Marvel decided to suspend the open submission process pending20review of their storytelling process. Does this decision spell trouble for other writers outside the medium looking in? Given your own experiences, what would you recommend to those writers who look for the same opportunity you were able to grab so successfully?
A: Well, first of all, that’s not how my early career was boosted at all. I was actually working at Marvel comics in the sales department. I pitched an idea to Jim Owsley (now known as Christopher Priest) for a single issue of Spider-Man. It was Owsley who then came to me with the notion of doing a four issue arc that would kill off Jean. (Editor’s note: Folks, this one was my bad. I misinterpreted some of my research on the topic.) As for the end of the open submission process…I’m obviously not part of the decision making that resulted in that, but I hope that Marvel reinstitutes it at some point soon.
We followed this with some questions regarding his overall work.
Q: You’ve been able to cross many different types of storytelling in your career- tv, comic books, novels, etc. Which medium is your favorite, and what makes it more special to you as a storyteller?
A: Probably novels. Short of standing on a soap box and delivering a story aloud, it’s the purest form of storytelling. It’s just you, your words, and your audience. The advantage of television is the number of people you can reach, and the advantage of comics is that the collaborative nature can result in a better product than you can turn out on your own. But as a storyteller, definitely novels have a special place.
Q: You’ve written several books for the Star Trek Universe, including books that have landed on the New York Times Best Seller list (“Imzadi” as an example). Star Trek is a bit different from other mediums as there are the performances by actors and actresses that can be used as inspirations for the story. Of the Trek novels and stories you’ve written, are there any that- given the right resources- you would have liked to see as a movie or episode arc?
A: Q-In-Law, definitely, would have been great to see as an episode. In fact, Majel pushed hard to try and make that happen .. Having Q square off against Lwaxana was something she desperately wanted them to produce, but she couldn’t convince them to do it. That would have been great.
As a side note, I’ve owned a copy of this book for around 15 years or so. One of the funniest books I’ve ever read, and definitely a gem if you find a copy.
Q: You’ve written stories that have crossed between science fiction, fantasy and the fantastic. Of the many characters you’ve written about, which one do you most enjoy writing for? LIkewise, was there a character you’ve written that you couldn’t wrap your head around well enough in your opinion?
A: Probably Sir Apropos of Nothing, the subject of three novels and the IDW series. He’s cranky, cynical, manages to see the downside of just about every situation. He’s pretty much my alter ego. In terms of characters I didn’t quite wrap my head around…probably Lobo. I guest starred him in an issue of Aquaman and it was just lousy. I couldn’t get a grip on him. Curiously, I introduced Little Lobo into Young Justice, and later his inferior clone Slobo, and them I had no trouble with. I guess Lobo comes across to me as such a juvenile character that I had no problem with him when he was juvenile.
Q: Do you have a “dream project” that you would love to do, given the opportunity?
A: The Phantom vs. Tarzan. How cool would that be? Failing that, Doc Savage. Always loved Doc Savage.
We finished with a question about one of Mr. David’s well-known passions in life.
Q: How do you think the Mets look this year?
A: I’ve given up predicting. Every year I think they look great and then injuries take their toll and then they melt down in September. Frankly, this year I’m probably just going to be looking from a distance considering the price of seats.
Again, we want to thank Mr. David for taking the time to write to us and answer some of our questions. We will have a podcast soon as a follow-up to this discussion.
You can find works by Peter David on Amazon, by following this link.
Out.